Wikipedia's Most-Read Pages Lost 24.5% of Their Readers Since 2022, While Its Least-Read Pages Gained 12.2%

Summary

Picture a roofing contractor in a small Kansas town with a page on his site about repairing hail damage on clay tile roofs. It never got much traffic, but the few people who found it often called. Meanwhile, his general 'how to choose a roofer' guide, which used to be his most visited page, has been sliding for two years. Wikipedia shows the same split across millions of pages.

We sorted 2.95 million English Wikipedia articles into ten equal groups by how many views they had in 2022, from the least read to the most read. The most-read tenth lost 24.5% of its views by the past 12 months. The least-read tenth gained 12.2%.

The pattern is a smooth line: the more popular a page was in 2022, the more readers it lost. Broad, popular questions are the kind AI answers handle best, though part of the pattern is popular pages cooling off as they always do. Narrow, specific pages are holding on.

What we measured

We took every English Wikipedia article with at least 1,200 views in 2022, ranked them by 2022 views and cut them into ten groups of equal size. For each group we compared total views in 2022 with October 2025 to September 2026, and calculated the median change per article and the share that grew or lost more than half.

Popular pages in any given year tend to cool off and small pages tend to bounce around, so part of this pattern is normal regression to the mean. Automated traffic that evades filters may also inflate views of rarely read pages. Both are reasons to read the deciles as a direction, not exact figures.

The more popular the page, the bigger the loss

Change in total views by 2022 popularity decile (each decile has 295,096 articles):

The line runs in one direction with no break. Pages read about a hundred times a month held their audience. Pages read tens of thousands of times a year lost a quarter of it.

Popular pages were twice as likely to lose more than half their readers

Share of articles in each decile that grew, or lost more than half:

Nearly half of the least-read pages gained readers. Fewer than a quarter of the most-read pages did.

Desktop readers of popular pages left fastest

Splitting by site shows the same gradient on both, steeper on desktop.

The most-read decile still accounted for 71.5% of all views in our set in the past 12 months, down from 75.4% in 2022. Attention is spreading slightly toward the long tail.

What this means

For a small business, this is encouraging. The broad, high-volume topics that big publishers chase are losing readers fastest. Specific, niche pages about a narrow problem, a local service or an unusual product are holding their audience far better. Most of the work in AI search optimization services for small firms is writing more pages like that.

Spend less effort on generic explainers and more on detailed pages that only you can write: your exact services, your area, your process, your prices. Those are also the pages AI tools cite when they need a specific answer. Start with a free AI visibility audit to learn which of your pages AI already draws on, then decide whether you need ongoing AI SEO services or just a few fixes.

Limits

Wikimedia pageview counts include some automated traffic that its filters do not catch, and Wikimedia changed how it detects bots in 2025, which lowers counted views from that point on. Some of the change in any period may reflect better bot filtering rather than fewer human readers.

We count views of titles that had at least 5 views in a given month on a given site, which drops a very small tail of rarely read pages.

Regression to the mean pushes popular pages down and small pages up in any period, so part of this gradient would appear without AI.

Some automated traffic that evades Wikimedia's filters lands on rarely read pages, which can inflate the bottom deciles.

Articles created after 2022 are not included; English Wikipedia as a whole fell 8.1% over the same period.

Our set excludes 73,411 articles that fell by more than 95% (often deleted, merged or renamed) and 4,005 that grew more than 20 times.

Frequently asked questions

Related studies

• Wikipedia readership in the AI answer eraFinance Explainer Pages on Wikipedia: Median Drop of 49.9%
• Wikipedia readership in the AI answer eraSpanish Wikipedia Views Fell 36.3%; English Fell 8.1%
• Wikipedia readership in the AI answer eraLegal Concept Pages Lost 46.9% of Wikipedia Readers
• Wikipedia readership in the AI answer eraHome System Pages on Wikipedia Lost 50.4% of Readers