Data study · Developer conversation on Hacker News

Hacker News Stories About Blocking AI Crawlers Average 51% More Points and 70% More Comments Than Other Stories

KGWritten by Kriszta GrenyoPublished October 20264 min read

348 stories about stopping AI crawlers and scrapers averaged 29.5 points and 17.9 comments, against 19.5 points and 10.5 comments for all stories posted in the same months. 2025 was the hottest year by far.

Analysis of 348 Hacker News stories about blocking AI crawlers, January 2023 to September 2026, compared with 1.2 million stories in the same months · Hacker News public dataset on Google BigQuery, October 2026

Key findings

  1. 1

    348 Hacker News stories about blocking or fighting AI crawlers averaged 29.5 points, 51.3% more than the 19.5-point average for all stories in the same months.

  2. 2

    They averaged 17.9 comments against a same-month baseline of 10.5, a 70.5% gap, for a total of 6,233 comments.

  3. 3

    6.6% of these stories passed 100 points (23 of 348), compared with 4.6% of all stories in the same months.

  4. 4

    2025 drove the result: 146 stories averaged 44.4 points against a 19.6-point baseline, and 16 of them passed 100 points.

  5. 5

    In 2024 and 2026 the topic ran below the site average on points (13.9 and 15.1 against about 19), showing the heat comes in waves.

  6. 6

    Independent blogs and small company sites posted 172 of the 348 stories (49.4%) and drew 2,463 comments, more than news media (108 stories, 1,283 comments).

Summary

Picture the owner of a small online shop who checks their hosting bill and finds traffic has tripled, but sales have not moved. The extra visitors are bots collecting pages for AI models. Plenty of site owners have had that moment, and many of them talk about it on Hacker News.

We found 348 stories since January 2023 whose titles are about stopping AI crawlers and scrapers, from robots.txt rules to tools that trap or slow bots down. We compared each one with every other story posted on the site in the same month.

On average these stories earned 51.3% more points and 70.5% more comments. The topic peaked in 2025, when self-hosters and small sites began writing up their fights with AI bot traffic.

What we measured

We used the public Hacker News table on Google BigQuery and kept live stories posted from January 2023 to September 2026. A story counted if its title combined an AI or crawler term, such as AI crawler, AI scraper, LLM bot, GPTBot or robots.txt for AI, or named a tool built to stop them, with a blocking or defense term such as block, trap, poison, ban, opt out, protect or DDoS. We removed titles that used scrap in other senses.

For each story, the baseline is the average for all live stories posted in the same calendar month. Points and comment counts are the values recorded at the October 2026 refresh. We grouped linked domains into broad categories and name only widely known platforms.

Crawler-blocking stories outscore the average

+51.3%more points on average than same-month stories (29.5 vs 19.5)

Most Hacker News stories get a handful of points and vanish. Stories about AI crawlers did better than that on every measure we checked.

AI crawler-blocking stories versus all stories in the same months
YearStoriesAvg pointsBaseline avg pointsAvg commentsBaseline avg commentsShare with 100+ pointsBaseline share 100+
20234931.42121.312.16.1% (3)5.4%
20245513.9197.510.21.8% (1)4.6%
202514644.419.626.510.511.0% (16)4.6%
2026 (Jan to Sep)9815.1199.29.83.1% (3)4.2%
All34829.519.517.910.56.6% (23)4.6%

Source: aisearchoptimization.net analysis of 348 Hacker News stories about blocking AI crawlers, January 2023 to September 2026, compared with 1.2 million stories in the same months · Hacker News public dataset on Google BigQuery, October 2026

The median story scored 4 points, against a typical monthly median of about 2.6 for all stories. The gap is larger in the averages because a few crawler stories drew hundreds of points and comments.

The most-discussed threads covered reports of undeclared AI crawlers ignoring no-crawl rules, open-source tarpits that trap AI scrapers, and default AI-bot blocking rolled out by a large content delivery network.

2025 was the boiling point

146crawler-blocking stories in 2025, averaging 44.4 points against a 19.6-point baseline

The number of these stories rose from 55 in 2024 to 146 in 2025. That year many small sites, code forges and open-source projects described AI bot traffic overwhelming their servers, and proof-of-work tools for stopping bots took off.

AI crawler-blocking stories per year and average points
StoriesAvg pointsAvg comments
2023
49
31.4
21.3
2024
55
13.9
7.5
2025
146
44.4
26.5
2026 (Jan to Sep)
98
15.1
9.2

Stories

YearStoriesAvg pointsAvg comments
20234931.421.3
20245513.97.5
202514644.426.5
2026 (Jan to Sep)9815.19.2

Source: aisearchoptimization.net analysis of 348 Hacker News stories about blocking AI crawlers, January 2023 to September 2026, compared with 1.2 million stories in the same months · Hacker News public dataset on Google BigQuery, October 2026

In 2026 the count stayed high at 98 stories in nine months, but average engagement dropped back below the site average. That suggests the topic has become routine on the site rather than a surprise.

Independent site owners lead the conversation

49.4%of crawler-blocking stories came from independent blogs and small company sites (172 of 348)

We sorted the linked sites into broad groups to see who is writing about the problem.

Where crawler-blocking stories came from
Source typeStoriesTotal pointsTotal comments
Independent blogs, small companies and other sites1724,2192,463
News and trade media1082,1811,283
Company sites of large tech platforms112,0791,247
Code hosting (GitHub and similar)40961699
Hacker News text posts (Ask HN, Tell HN)17824541

Source: aisearchoptimization.net analysis of 348 Hacker News stories about blocking AI crawlers, January 2023 to September 2026, compared with 1.2 million stories in the same months · Hacker News public dataset on Google BigQuery, October 2026

Half the stories came from independent blogs, small company sites and other sites rather than news media or large platforms. Among widely known platforms, GitHub hosted 37 stories (688 comments) and Cloudflare's blog 9 stories (931 comments). Ars Technica led news outlets with 18 stories.

What this means

People who run websites care a lot about AI crawlers, and the loudest voices are small site owners dealing with server load. Blocking every AI bot can protect your bandwidth, but it can also keep your business out of the AI answers your customers read. The decision deserves a deliberate choice, not a default. An AI SEO consultant can help you sort the bots that bring visibility from the ones that only take bandwidth.

A sensible middle path is to allow the crawlers that power AI answers and search, limit training-only bots if you prefer, and watch your logs. Checking your robots.txt for AI crawlers is part of every free AI visibility audit we run, and it should come before any spending on generative engine optimization services.

Limits

Stories were matched on title keywords. Some relevant stories use other wording, and a few matched titles may be only partly about crawler blocking.

Points and comments are values at the October 2026 refresh. Hacker News ranking also depends on timing and moderation, which the dataset does not record.

Averages are pulled up by a few very popular stories; medians show a smaller gap.

This measures discussion, not how many sites actually block AI crawlers.

2026 covers January to September only.

Embed this research

Add the charts from this study to your page. The embed links back here.

<iframe src="https://aisearchoptimization.net/embed/data-studies/ai-crawler-blocking-stories-hacker-news-engagement" title="AI Crawler Blocking Stories Score 51% Higher on Hacker News" width="100%" height="720" style="border:0" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Cite this study

APA

Grenyo, K. (2026). AI Crawler Blocking Stories Score 51% Higher on Hacker News. AI Search Optimization. https://aisearchoptimization.net/resources/data-studies/ai-crawler-blocking-stories-hacker-news-engagement

Plain link

AI Crawler Blocking Stories Score 51% Higher on Hacker News - AI Search Optimization - https://aisearchoptimization.net/resources/data-studies/ai-crawler-blocking-stories-hacker-news-engagement

Download the data (CSV)

Frequently asked questions

Do Hacker News readers care about AI crawlers?

Yes. 348 stories about blocking AI crawlers averaged 29.5 points and 17.9 comments, compared with 19.5 points and 10.5 comments for all stories in the same months.

When did the AI crawler debate peak on Hacker News?

In 2025. There were 146 such stories that year, averaging 44.4 points against a 19.6-point site baseline, and 16 passed 100 points.

Who writes about blocking AI crawlers?

Most often, independent sites. Independent blogs and small company sites posted 172 of the 348 stories (49.4%), ahead of news and trade media with 108.

Should a small business block AI crawlers?

It depends on your goals. Blocking saves bandwidth but can keep your business out of AI answers. Many sites allow AI search crawlers while limiting bots used only for model training.

See where AI search leaves you out

Run the free AI visibility audit. If you want the fixes done for you, the plan is a flat $299/month.